<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Two Roads of D&amp;D</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/</link>
	<description>DMPerez.com - The Domain of Daniel M.Perez</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 20:37:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donovan</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/comment-page-1/#comment-3105</link>
		<dc:creator>Donovan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/#comment-3105</guid>
		<description>Seems WotC&#039;s p*ss poor marketing and heavy handed approach to design have finally ticked off someone with the ways and means to respond.

I am solidly anti 4E for a number of reasons I wont get into here.  As to whether the &quot;3.75&quot; version Paizo is working on will work or not...only time will tell.

A lot will depend on how good 4E really is.

IMO the lack of backwards compatibility, and the overly &quot;cartoony&quot; feel of the new edition are the biggest obstacles to overcome for WotC.  The next 6-12 months will be VERY interesting methinks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems WotC&#8217;s p*ss poor marketing and heavy handed approach to design have finally ticked off someone with the ways and means to respond.</p>
<p>I am solidly anti 4E for a number of reasons I wont get into here.  As to whether the &#8220;3.75&#8243; version Paizo is working on will work or not&#8230;only time will tell.</p>
<p>A lot will depend on how good 4E really is.</p>
<p>IMO the lack of backwards compatibility, and the overly &#8220;cartoony&#8221; feel of the new edition are the biggest obstacles to overcome for WotC.  The next 6-12 months will be VERY interesting methinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paizo Sticks to 3.5 &#171; Purple Pawn - Game News Across the Board</title>
		<link>http://www.dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/comment-page-1/#comment-3102</link>
		<dc:creator>Paizo Sticks to 3.5 &#171; Purple Pawn - Game News Across the Board</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 06:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dmperez.com/2008/03/18/the-two-roads-of-dd/#comment-3102</guid>
		<description>[...] ChattyDM predicts that Paizo will eventually support 4th Edition with a separate product line. Highmoon marks this as the schism of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ChattyDM predicts that Paizo will eventually support 4th Edition with a separate product line. Highmoon marks this as the schism of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
